Cardiology · 3 h ago
AI-enhanced coronary CT improves ACS culprit-lesion discrimination in women and men
An EMERALD II sub-study analyzed 351 patients with coronary CT angiography performed before acute coronary syndrome. Adding AI-enabled plaque and hemodynamic features improved culprit-lesion discrimination beyond conventional CT assessment in both women and men.
- Analysis included 351 patients and 2,451 coronary lesions.
- AI-derived features improved culprit-lesion discrimination in both sexes.
- Delta FFRCT was the strongest individual predictor in both groups.
- Prospective clinical utility and patient outcome benefits remain unestablished.
A sub-study of EMERALD II examined sex-specific performance of conventional coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and AI-enabled quantitative coronary plaque and hemodynamic assessment for identifying subsequent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) culprit lesions. The analysis included 351 patients—90 women and 261 men—with 2,451 lesions. CCTA had been performed 1 month to 3 years before ACS; invasive coronary angiography at the event defined culprit and non-culprit lesions.
Conventional CCTA showed similar performance between sexes for obstructive stenosis, defined as CAD-RADS ≥3, whereas performance of high-risk plaque criteria differed by sex. Feature selection identified the same best AI-derived predictors in women and men. Adding these features improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.78 to 0.84 in women (p=0.002) and from 0.75 to 0.82 in men (p<0.001). Delta FFRCT had the highest discriminatory performance among individual predictors in both groups.
The findings support further evaluation of AI-enhanced CCTA for culprit-lesion discrimination in obstructive ACS. However, this analysis used imaging obtained before events in patients who subsequently developed ACS; it does not establish prospective clinical utility or improved patient outcomes. Women represented a smaller subgroup, and the available abstract does not describe independent validation or provide detailed sex-specific high-risk plaque results.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging: Sex Differences in Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome Culprit Lesion Using Conventional and AI-Enhanced Coronary CT Angiography ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
