Oncology · Pediatrics · Neurology · 2 h ago
Socioeconomic status linked to cognition after childhood brain tumours in Swedish cohort
A Swedish population-based registry study of 461 children found that lower parental socioeconomic status was associated with poorer neurocognitive functioning up to five years after brain tumour diagnosis. Socioeconomic status was not associated with the rate of cognitive decline or differential effects by age.
- Registry study included 461 children with repeated neurocognitive assessments.
- Higher socioeconomic status was associated with better scores across five domains.
- Socioeconomic status did not modify the rate of cognitive decline.
- Younger diagnosis age was associated with steeper nonverbal reasoning declines.
A Swedish population-based registry study examined socioeconomic status (SES) and longitudinal neurocognitive outcomes in 461 children diagnosed with brain tumours during 2008–2023. Children had completed at least two neurocognitive assessments; mean age at diagnosis was 7.98 years. Researchers assessed parental education, occupation and household income individually and as a combined SES measure. Linear mixed models accounted for time since diagnosis, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, examining outcomes up to five years after diagnosis.
Higher SES was associated with higher neurocognitive z-scores for processing speed (B=0.23), working memory (B=0.25), nonverbal reasoning (B=0.29), verbal reasoning (B=0.41) and global cognition (B=0.42; all q≤0.039). No interactions between SES and age or time were observed. Longer time since diagnosis was associated with lower processing speed and verbal reasoning. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with steeper declines in nonverbal reasoning, while craniospinal irradiation was associated with lower processing speed (B=−0.50; q=0.019).
The findings highlight socioeconomic disparities relevant to neurocognitive follow-up after childhood brain tumours. The authors suggest that lower SES may reflect reduced baseline cognitive reserve rather than greater disease- or treatment-related toxicity, but this interpretation is not established causally. The observational study required repeated assessments, and only the abstract was available for review, limiting appraisal of selection effects and residual confounding.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Neuro-Oncology: Socioeconomic status and longitudinal neurocognitive outcomes following childhood brain tumour diagnosis: a Swedish national population-based cohort study ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
