← All updates
Observational study

Pulmonology ·

Pre-COPD Score Predicts Incident COPD in Three Cohorts

A score based on smoking, symptoms, asthma and spirometry predicted progression to COPD in three cohorts of people without airflow obstruction at baseline. Risk-category incidence and discrimination varied across the development cohort and two external validation cohorts.

Researchers developed a pre-COPD score using 14,506 participants from the Copenhagen General Population Study who had no airflow obstruction at baseline. The score assigned points for a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, current smoking, respiratory symptoms, asthma and a pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.70–0.75; pre-bronchodilator FEV1 below 80% predicted received four points. Validation was conducted in the Copenhagen City Heart Study (8,673 participants) and COPDGene (2,982 participants). Participants were followed for five to 10 years; incident COPD was defined using pre-bronchodilator spirometry.

COPD developed in 4.6% of the development cohort, 7.9% of the Copenhagen validation cohort and 12% of COPDGene. In the development cohort, 10-year incidence ranged from 1.5% in the low-risk category to 42% in the very-high-risk category. Five-year incidence in the validation cohorts ranged from 3.7% to 25% in Copenhagen and from 4.1% to 31% in COPDGene. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.88, 0.76 and 0.81, respectively. The score was also associated with exacerbations.

The findings support risk stratification across cohorts with different risk profiles, but the abstract does not establish how the score should guide clinical decisions or whether its use improves outcomes.

AI summary · Not yet editor-reviewed

Is this summary clinically accurate?

Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.

Sign in to rate this summary →

Source

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine: Development and Validation of a Pre-COPD Score to Predict Incident COPD ↗

This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.