General Practice ·
GP absence linked to small, temporary workload increases in Norwegian practices
A register-based cohort study used difference-in-differences and event-study models to assess workload and consultation patterns around GP absences. Across 2,890 GP contracts in 1,078 Norwegian practices, colleagues’ workload rose modestly and temporarily, with larger and more persistent changes where practices had no locum.
- Colleague workload rose by 1.43 hours monthly on average.
- The increase peaked in the first month and then subsided.
- Changes were larger in practices without a locum.
- Consultations with GPs’ own patients remained stable.
Researchers linked Norwegian General Practitioner register data with health reimbursement records from 2016–2020. The analysis included 2,890 GP contracts across 1,078 group practices and compared monthly workload and consultation patterns for six months before and after a GP’s absence, using practices without an absence as comparators.
A GP’s absence was associated with an average increase of 1.43 active working hours per month among remaining colleagues. The increase was mainly attributable to consultations with patients registered with other GPs, peaked in the first month, and returned to baseline shortly thereafter. Consultations with colleagues’ own patients remained stable.
Workload changes were larger and more persistent in practices without a locum, and the first-month increase was more pronounced in smaller practices. The authors note that these subgroup comparisons are observational. The findings describe short-term workload patterns in Norwegian group practices; they do not establish how absence affects clinical outcomes or patient access in other healthcare systems.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health: Colleague absence in general practice: A difference-in-differences analysis of effects on workload and patient access ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
