Infectious Disease · Public Health · 2 h ago
Pathotypr expands lineage classification for tuberculosis genomic surveillance
An early-release study in *Emerging Infectious Diseases* describes Pathotypr, an open-source, alignment-free tool for classifying tuberculosis lineages and detecting resistance-associated variants. Evaluations included 88,071 samples and 7,148 CRyPTIC isolates; the authors report broader lineage coverage and agreement between genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles in 86.4% of isolates.
- Pathotypr classifies assemblies and raw reads.
- Benchmark included 88,071 samples.
- Resistance-profile agreement was 86.4% in CRyPTIC.
- Uncommon lineages remain sparsely sampled.
Whole-genome sequencing can support tuberculosis surveillance, but incomplete lineage schemes may leave isolates unclassified or assign them incorrectly. Researchers developed Pathotypr, an open-source tool that accepts genome assemblies or raw sequencing reads and reports lineage assignments, WHO-cataloged resistance-associated variants, and a closely related reference genome. Its marker set was derived from 26,813 *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* complex genomes. The authors evaluated the software using independent datasets, an 88,071-sample benchmark, and 7,148 CRyPTIC genomes.
In validation, the assembly-based methods matched phylogenetic lineage assignments in 498 complete reference genomes (498 for Predict; 497 for Classify), while the read-based module assigned all 162 clinical read datasets to the expected lineage. In the 88,071-sample benchmark, Pathotypr and TB-Profiler agreed on major-lineage assignments for directly comparable samples; Pathotypr also identified uncommon L10, A1, and A2 isolates not identified by TB-Profiler’s marker set. For the 7,148 CRyPTIC isolates, genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles agreed in 86.4%; sensitivity for multidrug-resistant or pre-extensively drug-resistant status was 93.5%, with a positive predictive value of 92.3%.
The findings support Pathotypr’s potential use in genomic surveillance, not replacement of phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing. Agreement was lower for several drugs, including bedaquiline and linezolid. The article is an early-release version, and the authors note that uncommon lineages are sparsely sampled; CRyPTIC is also enriched for drug-resistant isolates and is not population-based.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Emerging Infectious Diseases: Alignment-Free Tool for Assemblies and Reads in Genomic Surveillance of Tuberculosis ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
