Cardiology · 3 h ago
Rural Hospitalization Linked to Differences in Heart Failure Care and Outcomes
A retrospective cohort study of 735,460 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF examined patient and hospital rurality in relation to care and outcomes. Rural patients treated at rural hospitals had lower use of guideline-directed therapies and higher mortality than rural patients treated at urban hospitals; rural residence was also associated with higher early mortality among patients treated at urban hospitals.
- Cohort included 735,460 Medicare beneficiaries with HFrEF.
- Rural hospitals were associated with lower GDMT use.
- Rural residence remained associated with higher early mortality.
- Observational findings do not establish causation.
This retrospective cohort study included 735,460 Medicare beneficiaries discharged alive after hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at US hospitals from 2013 through 2021. Patients were grouped according to their own rural or urban residence and the rurality of the hospital. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included cardiology consultation, postdischarge guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use, and heart failure readmission.
Compared with rural patients treated at rural hospitals, rural patients treated at urban hospitals were more likely to receive inpatient cardiology consultation (odds ratio [OR], 2.02) and to initiate several GDMT classes, including SGLT2 inhibitors (OR, 1.48). They also had lower one-year heart failure readmission (OR, 0.85) and mortality (OR, 0.91). Compared with urban patients treated at urban hospitals, rural patients treated at urban hospitals had higher early mortality (30-day OR, 1.10; 90-day OR, 1.05), despite lower one-year heart failure readmission (OR, 0.81).
The findings associate hospital rurality with differences in treatment and mortality, while rural residence was associated with mortality differences even at urban hospitals. The observational design cannot establish causation; the results point to disparities in care and outcomes rather than demonstrating that a particular intervention would improve them.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
JAMA Cardiology: Intersection of Patient and Hospital Rurality in Heart Failure Care and Outcomes ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
