Endocrinology · Oncology · Pediatrics · 3 h ago
Clinicogenomic Model Stratifies Recurrence Risk in Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Cancer
A retrospective multicenter study of 435 patients aged 2–18 years developed a clinicogenomic model for disease-free survival in papillary thyroid cancer. The model outperformed ATA pediatric risk stratification in internal comparisons, but treatment associations require external validation and do not establish the safety of de-escalation.
- Retrospective multicenter analysis included 435 pediatric patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
- Clinicogenomic stratification outperformed ATA risk classification in internal comparisons.
- Seven-year disease-free survival ranged from 92.4% to 56.4% across groups.
- Treatment associations do not establish the safety of de-escalation.
A retrospective multicenter study published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism evaluated 435 patients aged 2–18 years with papillary thyroid carcinoma treated between 2006 and 2024. Researchers developed a disease-free survival (DFS) nomogram combining clinical characteristics, postoperative pathology, and molecular testing of surgical tissue. They compared its performance internally with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) pediatric risk system and assessed treatment associations within risk groups.
Five factors independently predicted worse DFS: age ≤15 years, tumor size >4 cm, lateral neck lymph node involvement (N1b), coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis, and RET/NTRK fusions (all P <.05). Seven-year DFS was 92.4%, 83.1%, and 56.4% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P <.001). The nomogram had a higher concordance index than ATA stratification (0.721 vs 0.656) and a higher three-year area under the curve (0.748 vs 0.651; both P <.05).
Total thyroidectomy was associated with better DFS than lobectomy in intermediate- and high-risk patients, but not in low-risk patients. Postoperative radioactive iodine was associated with higher DFS in the high-risk group (P =.028). These findings suggest a potential risk-adapted treatment framework, but the retrospective associations cannot establish treatment benefit. Nonsignificant differences, particularly in small subgroups, do not demonstrate equivalence or support safe de-escalation. External validation is needed; assessment here is limited to the abstract.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism: Clinical and Molecular Genetic Testing Risk Stratification for Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Therapy ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
