Obstetrics & Gynecology · General Practice · Public Health · 2 h ago
Border-region survey identifies gaps in menopause care and treatment engagement
A cross-sectional survey of 340 postmenopausal women at a US–Mexico border tertiary care center found frequent symptoms, but 58% reported these had never been addressed by a clinician. Treatment engagement varied by age, education, and ethnicity, with Hispanic participants less likely to have received mental health treatment.
- Sleep disturbances affected 73%; weight gain affected 68%.
- 58% reported symptoms had never been addressed by a clinician.
- Hispanic participants had lower odds of receiving mental health treatment.
- Cross-sectional findings cannot establish causes of treatment disparities.
A cross-sectional study published in Menopause assessed symptom burden, clinician engagement, and treatment use among 340 postmenopausal women receiving care from 2021 to 2024 at a tertiary care center on the US–Mexico border. Participants in the predominantly Hispanic cohort completed a bilingual survey; mean age was 55.8 years. Researchers evaluated associations using multivariable logistic or Poisson regression.
Sleep disturbances affected 73% of participants (95% CI, 68%–77%), and weight gain affected 68% (95% CI, 63%–73%). Overall, 58% (95% CI, 52%–63%) said their symptoms had never been addressed by a clinician. Participants younger than 55 had higher odds of vasomotor, sleep, and mood symptoms, while older participants were more likely to have discussed menopause with a clinician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16–2.97) or used hormone therapy (aOR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.53–5.50).
Higher education was associated with hormone therapy use and mental health treatment. Despite similar symptom prevalence, Hispanic participants had lower odds of receiving mental health treatment (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.19–0.65).
The findings highlight gaps in symptom recognition and treatment engagement and support attention to culturally and linguistically tailored menopause care. However, the cross-sectional, self-reported data cannot establish causality, and a single tertiary-center cohort may not represent other populations. The education–hormone therapy association was imprecise (aOR, 5.63; 95% CI, 1.09–29.08).
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Menopause: Evaluating menopausal symptom burden and treatment engagement in a predominantly Hispanic population on the United States‐Mexico border ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
