← All updates
Meta-analysis

Cardiology · General Practice · 3 h ago

Digital commitment devices modestly improve activity and weight in at-risk adults

A systematic review and meta-analysis included 29 randomized trials with 7,534 adults with elevated cardiometabolic risk. Digital commitment devices were associated with higher daily step counts and greater weight loss, although weight-loss results varied across studies and long-term effects remain uncertain.

Lifestyle changes can reduce cardiovascular risk, but maintaining them is difficult. This systematic review searched 12 databases through August 2025 and included 29 randomized controlled trials involving 7,534 adults with elevated cardiometabolic risk. Two reviewers assessed study quality, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate; certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Compared with control conditions, digital commitment devices increased daily steps by a weighted mean of 664.87 (95% CI, 463.22 to 866.51; I²=0%). They were also associated with 1.90 kg greater weight loss (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.59 kg; I²=70%). The review additionally reported improvements in self-reported emotional and uncontrolled eating, body-fat percentage, diet, and medication adherence.

The findings suggest these digital approaches may support some lifestyle outcomes in adults at cardiometabolic risk. However, the substantial heterogeneity in weight-loss results and the lack of long-term follow-up limit conclusions about durability or effects on clinical cardiovascular outcomes. The authors call for trials with follow-up beyond 12 months; the reported findings do not establish that these devices prevent cardiovascular events.

In practice

For adults with elevated cardiometabolic risk, digital commitment devices may help increase physical activity and support modest weight loss: pooled estimates showed about 665 additional daily steps and 1.90 kg greater weight loss versus controls. These findings support potential use as a lifestyle-support approach, but do not show prevention of cardiovascular events or establish lasting benefit. Weight-loss results varied substantially between trials, and the review identifies a need for follow-up beyond 12 months; the evidence does not justify assuming durable effects.

AI-generated clinical interpretation · Not editor-reviewed

AI summary · Not yet editor-reviewed

Is this summary clinically accurate?

Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.

Sign in to rate this summary →