Endocrinology · Internal Medicine · 7 h ago
Safiglipron meets HbA1c noninferiority endpoint versus dapagliflozin in phase 3 trial
The randomized, double-blind OUTSTAND-2 trial enrolled 810 adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. All three safiglipron doses were noninferior to dapagliflozin for HbA1c reduction at 32 weeks; only 90 mg established superiority under prespecified testing. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with safiglipron.
- All three safiglipron doses met HbA1c noninferiority criteria.
- Only 90 mg established superiority under prespecified sequential testing.
- Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with safiglipron.
- The trial assessed glycemic efficacy, not cardiovascular or renal outcomes.
The phase 3 OUTSTAND-2 trial, reported in Nature Medicine, randomized 810 adults at 98 sites in China to once-daily oral safiglipron 30, 60 or 90 mg or dapagliflozin 10 mg. Participants had type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and a mean baseline HbA1c of 8.60%. The double-blind, double-dummy trial assessed HbA1c change at 32 weeks, followed by a 20-week active-treatment extension. Safiglipron is a small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist administered without fasting or dietary restrictions.
Under the primary noninferiority estimand, HbA1c fell by 1.58, 1.50 and 1.68 percentage points with safiglipron 30, 60 and 90 mg, respectively, versus 1.28 points with dapagliflozin. All doses met the 0.4-point noninferiority margin. Under the treatment-policy estimand, 90 mg established superiority, with a difference of −0.25 points (95% CI −0.45 to −0.05). The 60-mg dose did not establish superiority, stopping fixed-sequence testing; subsequent hypotheses were not confirmatory.
HbA1c below 7.0% was achieved by 54.9–63.5% of safiglipron recipients versus 36.5% with dapagliflozin. Mean weight changes were −2.35%, −3.55% and −4.17% across increasing safiglipron doses versus −3.60% with dapagliflozin.
Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with safiglipron and mostly mild or moderate. Adverse events caused discontinuation in 3.9–4.0% versus 1.5% with dapagliflozin. Findings support glycemic efficacy, but the primary endpoint was a surrogate, not cardiovascular or renal outcomes, and recruitment exclusively in China limits generalizability.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Nature Medicine: Oral small-molecule GLP-1RA safiglipron versus dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
