Endocrinology · Obstetrics & Gynecology · General Practice · 3 h ago
Hormone–bisphosphonate combination improves postmenopausal bone density; fracture superiority remains uncertain
A network meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials involving 2,861 postmenopausal women found that menopausal hormone therapy plus bisphosphonates had the most favorable hip-region bone mineral density profile. Evidence remains insufficient to establish superior fracture prevention or long-term safety.
- Analysis included 16 randomized trials and 2,861 postmenopausal women.
- MHT plus bisphosphonates showed the most favorable hip-region BMD profile.
- Sparse fracture events limit conclusions about superior fracture prevention.
- MHT-containing regimens increased breast pain and vaginal spotting or bleeding.
A systematic review and network meta-analysis published in Menopause compared systemic menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and combined regimens in postmenopausal women. Researchers searched four databases through April 14, 2026, and included 16 randomized controlled trials involving 2,861 women. Outcomes included site-specific bone mineral density (BMD), fractures, and selected adverse events.
All active regimens increased lumbar spine BMD compared with control. The largest mean differences were reported for MHT plus calcitonin (12.24%; 95% CI, 7.46–17.01) and MHT plus bisphosphonates (9.71%; 95% CI, 6.99–12.42), although calcitonin estimates relied on limited evidence. MHT plus bisphosphonates had the most favorable hip-region BMD profile, with mean differences versus control of 4.87% at the femoral neck (95% CI, 2.66–7.07) and 6.65% at the femoral trochanter (95% CI, 5.12–8.17).
MHT plus bisphosphonates was associated with fewer fractures of any type versus control (risk ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28–0.93). However, fracture events were sparse and often not prespecified efficacy outcomes. MHT alone and combined with bisphosphonates increased risks of breast pain and vaginal spotting or bleeding. The BMD findings therefore do not establish superior fracture prevention with combination therapy, and long-term safety remains uncertain.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Menopause: Menopausal hormone therapy combined with antiresorptive therapy for skeletal outcomes in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
