Public Health · 57 min ago
China survey links nutrition campaign knowledge with stronger professional engagement
A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 4,520 professionals involved in China’s National Nutrition Week found that greater campaign knowledge was associated with more favourable implementation appraisals and higher engagement. The findings are observational and do not establish that knowledge or engagement caused better implementation.
- Survey analysed 4,520 professionals across China.
- Campaign knowledge was associated with engagement and appraisal.
- Participation breadth associations attenuated beyond about six settings.
- Cross-sectional findings do not establish causality.
National Nutrition Week is a nationwide nutrition promotion campaign in China that relies on professionals to interpret messages and deliver local activities. In a cross-sectional online survey conducted from September 2025 to January 2026, researchers analysed 4,520 valid responses from professionals recruited through networks in all 31 provincial-level administrative regions. The survey assessed campaign knowledge, participation mode and breadth, toolkit use, and implementation appraisal; analyses adjusted for demographic and professional characteristics.
Higher campaign knowledge was associated with more favourable implementation appraisal (β=2.52, 95% CI 2.14–2.91). It was also associated with broader participation (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.29–1.44), involvement through both online and offline modes (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.50–1.92), and toolkit use (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.57–1.78). The association between participation breadth and appraisal attenuated beyond approximately six communication channels or delivery settings. Exploratory mediation analyses estimated that engagement indicators partly accounted for the knowledge-appraisal association.
The results may inform campaign planning, including role definition, channel mix, and toolkit accessibility. However, the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality, and the outcomes were professionals’ reported appraisals rather than independently measured campaign effects. The Chinese Nutrition Society funded the study and supported questionnaire development and survey dissemination; the authors report that it had no role in analysis or publication decisions.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
BMC Public Health: Professional engagement and implementation appraisal in China’s national nutrition week: a nationwide cross-sectional study ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
