Nephrology · 28 Oct
Medicare’s ETC Model showed no clear improvement in timely transplant access
A difference-in-differences study of 26,809 adults receiving dialysis in three southeastern states found no statistically significant improvement in timely transplant referral, evaluation, or waitlisting after Medicare’s End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Model began. The findings suggest the financial-incentive model did not clearly change transplant access during the study period.
- Study included 26,809 dialysis patients in three states.
- No access outcome showed a statistically significant improvement.
- COVID-era referral delays affected both study groups.
Medicare’s End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) Model, introduced in 2021, assigned 30% of US dialysis facilities to financial incentives intended to increase home dialysis, transplant waitlisting, and living-donor transplantation. Researchers used linked registry and administrative data to compare adult Traditional Medicare beneficiaries starting dialysis at ETC and control facilities in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. The difference-in-differences analysis included 26,809 people at 706 facilities, comparing 2015–2019 with 2021–2023.
The study assessed referral within one year of dialysis initiation, evaluation initiation within six months of referral, and waitlisting or living-donor transplantation within two years. Adjusted differential increases associated with ETC implementation were 3.58 percentage points for timely referral (95% CI, −1.30 to 8.45), 8.52 points for evaluation initiation (95% CI, −1.42 to 18.45), and 3.61 points for waitlisting or living-donor transplantation (95% CI, −0.26 to 7.48). All confidence intervals included no difference; time-to-event analyses were consistent.
The results provide no definitive evidence that the model improved these access measures in the three states. COVID-era delays in referral affected both groups, and findings may not generalize beyond the study population and region. The authors conclude that incentive misalignment alone is unlikely to explain the model’s limited impact on transplantation.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: Association of Medicare’s ESRD Treatment Choices Model with Timely Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeastern United States ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
