Cardiology · Public Health · 3 h ago
Higher Hospital TAVR Volume Associated With Lower 30-Day Stroke Rates
A retrospective cohort study of 336 hospital-measure observations from 85 California hospitals linked higher TAVR volume to lower risk-adjusted 30-day mortality and stroke rates. Only the stroke association remained statistically significant in sensitivity analysis; county-level socioeconomic associations were limited and model-dependent.
- Study included 336 hospital-measure observations from 85 California hospitals.
- Higher TAVR volume correlated with lower risk-adjusted 30-day stroke rates.
- Mortality association was not statistically significant in sensitivity analysis.
- County-level findings do not exclude patient-level socioeconomic disparities.
A retrospective cohort study examined whether county-level socioeconomic characteristics were associated with short-term transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes independently of hospital procedural volume. Researchers analyzed 336 hospital-measure observations from 85 California hospitals in the CMS TAVR database during 2022–2023. Hospital risk-adjusted 30-day mortality and stroke rates were linked to county income, insurance coverage, and racial composition using mixed-effects models adjusted for year and procedural volume.
Higher log-transformed TAVR volume was associated with lower mortality (β=-0.334; 95% CI, -0.651 to -0.018; p=0.046) and stroke (β=-0.541; 95% CI, -0.844 to -0.237; p=0.001). In sensitivity analyses using log-transformed observed-to-expected ratios, the stroke association persisted (p=0.010), but mortality was no longer statistically significant (p=0.072). County income and racial composition were not associated with mortality. An unadjusted association between lower county income and lower stroke rates disappeared after full adjustment (p=0.854), and no significant income–volume interaction was identified.
Procedural volume was the most reproducible correlate of favorable outcomes, particularly stroke, supporting further investigation of care delivery at experienced TAVR centers. However, this observational, ecological analysis cannot establish causality or exclude patient-level socioeconomic disparities. County-level findings should not be interpreted as evidence of equitable access or outcomes for individual patients.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Journal of the American College of Surgeons: Institutional Volume and County-Level Socioeconomic Characteristics in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
