Public Health · 1 h ago
Review maps emergency care barriers for transient populations in mountain regions
A scoping review of 23 sources identified barriers across the emergency care pathway for transient and mobile populations in mountain settings. Terrain, weather, communication gaps, and limited system capacity contributed to delays, while predictable visitor surges strained local resources.
- Review included 23 sources from 737 identified records.
- Delays affected multiple stages, from incident recognition to definitive care.
- Predictable visitor surges frequently strained local emergency resources.
- Intervention effectiveness requires further evaluation.
A scoping review published in the Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine examined emergency healthcare access for transient and mobile populations in mountainous environments. Researchers searched six databases and search platforms, with two reviewers independently screening records. Of 737 records identified, 23 sources were included, covering tourists, climbers, pilgrims, migrants, disaster-affected populations, and mass-gathering participants.
Common barriers included difficult terrain, limited roads, variable weather, altitude-related operational constraints, communication limitations, and insufficient emergency medical capacity. Tourism, pilgrimage, and sporting events generated predictable surges that frequently strained local resources. Delays extended from incident recognition and system activation through responder access, field care, evacuation, interfacility transfer, and definitive care. Reported facilitators included helicopter emergency medical services, on-site clinics, specialized mountain rescue systems, telemedicine, drones, and geospatial planning tools.
The findings support planning across the entire care pathway rather than addressing transport alone, with provision for terrain, weather, altitude, and predictable demand. However, the review mapped heterogeneous evidence descriptively rather than establishing intervention effectiveness. The authors called for standardized access measures, geospatial modeling, and further evaluation of interventions. They reported no specific funding or competing interests.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine: Emergency healthcare access for transient populations in mountainous environments: a scoping review ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
