Gastroenterology · Internal Medicine · Public Health · 4 h ago
Navigation and Reminders Improve Colonoscopy Follow-Up After Abnormal Stool Screening Tests
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies involving 19,613 patients found that patient navigation, reminders, and automated referrals increased colonoscopy completion after abnormal FIT/FOBT results. Moderate to high heterogeneity limits interpretation, particularly for automated referrals.
- Meta-analysis included 21 studies and 19,613 patients aged 50–75 years.
- Navigation, patient reminders, and clinician reminders improved colonoscopy completion.
- Automated referrals showed benefit, but estimates varied substantially between studies.
- Cancer morbidity and mortality were not reported endpoints.
A systematic review and meta-analysis in JAMA Internal Medicine evaluated interventions to improve follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) results. Researchers searched three databases through May 9, 2026, and included 21 randomized or nonrandomized interventional studies involving 19,613 patients aged 50–75 years. Outcomes were colonoscopy completion prevalence and relative risks, pooled using random-effects models.
Colonoscopy completion was higher with patient navigation (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15–1.33), patient reminders (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04–1.67), clinician reminders (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12–1.65), and automated referrals for gastrointestinal consultation (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09–2.60). Completion occurred in 4,755 of 10,263 control participants and 6,272 of 9,350 intervention participants. Pooled prevalence estimates were 47.8% and 69.1%, respectively.
These findings support patient- and system-level approaches to closing gaps in follow-up after abnormal stool screening results. However, heterogeneity was moderate to high across intervention categories, with I² values ranging from 57.1% to 94.4%. Excluding outliers reduced heterogeneity for several approaches, but moderate heterogeneity remained for automated referrals. The authors called for further evaluation of automated referrals and the incremental contributions of individual components in multicomponent interventions. The reported endpoint was colonoscopy completion, not colorectal cancer morbidity or mortality; full text was unavailable for this assessment.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
JAMA Internal Medicine: Evaluation of Intervention Strategies to Improve Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal FIT/FOBT Result ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
