Surgery · 1 h ago
Two-center study evaluates composite outcome after robotic pancreatic enucleation
A retrospective two-center study of 79 patients evaluated a procedure-specific composite quality measure after robotic pancreatic enucleation. All six criteria were met by 64.5% of patients at Heidelberg and 60.4% at Johns Hopkins.
- Retrospective study included 79 patients at two institutions.
- Composite outcome achieved in 60.4%–64.5% of patients.
- Pancreatic fistula affected 19.4% of Heidelberg patients.
- Individual failure components differed despite similar overall achievement rates.
A retrospective cohort study in Surgical Endoscopy evaluated a proposed textbook outcome for robotic pancreatic enucleation, a parenchyma-sparing procedure for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic lesions. The study included 31 patients treated at Heidelberg University Hospital between April 2023 and March 2025 and an independent cohort of 48 patients treated at Johns Hopkins between September 2017 and October 2025. The composite required no open conversion, no incomplete resection requiring reoperation, no clinically relevant pancreatic fistula, no other major complications, no 30-day readmission, and no 90-day mortality.
The composite outcome was achieved by 20 Heidelberg patients (64.5%) and 29 Johns Hopkins patients (60.4%). In Heidelberg, six patients (19.4%) developed clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, four (12.9%) required open conversion, and one (3.2%) required reoperation for incomplete resection. Major complications and 30-day readmission each occurred in two patients (6.5%); there were no deaths within 90 days. Individual components contributing to composite failure differed between institutions. Patients meeting the composite had shorter hospital stays in both cohorts, although numerical differences were not provided in the supplied results.
The proposed measure combines established perioperative endpoints with procedure-specific goals and could support quality assessment. However, the small, retrospective, two-center study limits generalizability. Similar overall achievement rates also masked differences in individual complications, underscoring the importance of reporting component outcomes alongside the composite.
Is this summary clinically accurate?
Help fellow clinicians: your rating sends inaccurate summaries straight to our editors.
Sign in to rate this summary →Source
Surgical Endoscopy: Textbook outcome after robotic pancreatic enucleation: a two-center evaluation of an ideal perioperative pathway ↗This is an automated AI-condensed summary that has not yet been reviewed by an editor. Always consult the full item at the original source.
